I asked some of my most learned facebook friends for their top 3 US Masters picks. Here’s what they said: also see my US Masters Betting S...
I asked some of my most learned facebook friends for their top 3 US Masters picks. Here’s what they said:
also see my US Masters Betting Shortlist and 5 Outsiders To Watch
Aimpoint is an expert on Augusta's greens. Here are Mark’s thoughts
I have run tournament predictions for several years and now just focus on majors due to the amount of effort it takes to do a good job. In 2009 my stats loved Lucas Glover even though he had never performed well in a US Open, so I picked him as a sleeper against all conventional wisdom and he won (article). What I have found is that picking a top 10 is pretty easy, but picking the winner is extraordinarily difficult. The best predictive models work on momentum and consistency, so that is what I’m going to use for this year’s Masters.
To make life easier, I first eliminate all the players that I don’t think have a realistic chance of winning. This includes first-timers, past champions who are past their prime, amateurs, and players who qualified from wins prior to 2012. This filter cut 35 players out of contention, about a third of the field.
The next filter I use is I eliminate anyone without a strong short game and a high GIR rating combined. All my studies show that the winners best differentiate themselves in GIR, Putting, and Scrambling above all else. If you can’t hit greens, chip and putt, especially on super fast greens, then you don’t have a good chance of winning the Masters. This qualification eliminates everyone but the top 30 players in this ranking.
At this point I start looking at scoring average. If we adjust for lowest scoring averages in 2013 we get the following players making the Top 15 list:
Just barely missing the cut are Fowler, McIroy, Oosthuizen, Day, Dufner, Donald, Watney, and Poulter. This is not to say they are not still dangerous, it just says some of their performance stats are not quite as high cumulatively as the Top 15.
The final picks are part science and part art, looking at trends and trying to predict if a player is trending up or down just prior to the Masters . Positive trending players are Woods, Rose, and Stenson. Woods is playing the best of everyone right now so he makes Top 3, and Rose has been consistently rising all year, so he does too. Stenson has been hot but I’m afraid he’s may have maxed out over the last few weeks with three top 10 finishes. The other players are all trending down, which is not necessarily a bad thing. The fact is that no player can sustain a hot streak for more than 3 tournaments, except Woods during his strongest years. So often a player trending down will turn it his around right on cue. Mickelson is a perfect example. He tends to play great for a couple tournaments, then average for a couple tournaments before reversing the trend again. And guess what, his last two events where average at best which makes him another Top 3 contender in my view. So my Top 3 are Woods, Rose, and Mickelson, followed by Haas, Bradley, Snedeker, Stricker, and Stenson. But based on pure gut feel, I like Rose to win.
also see my US Masters Betting Shortlist and 5 Outsiders To Watch
Aimpoint is an expert on Augusta's greens. Here are Mark’s thoughts
I have run tournament predictions for several years and now just focus on majors due to the amount of effort it takes to do a good job. In 2009 my stats loved Lucas Glover even though he had never performed well in a US Open, so I picked him as a sleeper against all conventional wisdom and he won (article). What I have found is that picking a top 10 is pretty easy, but picking the winner is extraordinarily difficult. The best predictive models work on momentum and consistency, so that is what I’m going to use for this year’s Masters.
To make life easier, I first eliminate all the players that I don’t think have a realistic chance of winning. This includes first-timers, past champions who are past their prime, amateurs, and players who qualified from wins prior to 2012. This filter cut 35 players out of contention, about a third of the field.
The next filter I use is I eliminate anyone without a strong short game and a high GIR rating combined. All my studies show that the winners best differentiate themselves in GIR, Putting, and Scrambling above all else. If you can’t hit greens, chip and putt, especially on super fast greens, then you don’t have a good chance of winning the Masters. This qualification eliminates everyone but the top 30 players in this ranking.
At this point I start looking at scoring average. If we adjust for lowest scoring averages in 2013 we get the following players making the Top 15 list:
Bradley |
Garcia |
Haas |
Kuchar |
Mahan |
McDowell |
Mickelson |
Rose |
Simpson |
Snedeker |
Stenson |
Streelman |
Stricker |
Watson |
Woods |
Just barely missing the cut are Fowler, McIroy, Oosthuizen, Day, Dufner, Donald, Watney, and Poulter. This is not to say they are not still dangerous, it just says some of their performance stats are not quite as high cumulatively as the Top 15.
The final picks are part science and part art, looking at trends and trying to predict if a player is trending up or down just prior to the Masters . Positive trending players are Woods, Rose, and Stenson. Woods is playing the best of everyone right now so he makes Top 3, and Rose has been consistently rising all year, so he does too. Stenson has been hot but I’m afraid he’s may have maxed out over the last few weeks with three top 10 finishes. The other players are all trending down, which is not necessarily a bad thing. The fact is that no player can sustain a hot streak for more than 3 tournaments, except Woods during his strongest years. So often a player trending down will turn it his around right on cue. Mickelson is a perfect example. He tends to play great for a couple tournaments, then average for a couple tournaments before reversing the trend again. And guess what, his last two events where average at best which makes him another Top 3 contender in my view. So my Top 3 are Woods, Rose, and Mickelson, followed by Haas, Bradley, Snedeker, Stricker, and Stenson. But based on pure gut feel, I like Rose to win.
Technorati Tags: 2013 US Masters Betting Preview and Tips
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete